Infinite Warfare Vs. Battlefield 1
- Thread starter Kamil Pierwola
- Start date
Hmm.. I don't know about either game personally, hah. Do you have some kind of comparison between the two games?
It has to be infinite warfare. I always liked games like halo and even though i fear it's going toward that theme i still think it's gonna be an amazing game! And the cod 4 remastered to which will hopefully be epic!
Call of duty does not listen to there fans as can be seen from infinite warfare. Most people wanted a change from the futuristic theme but nope they do it again and then make you pay £70 for cod 4 which is one of the only reasons they are going to make any money. I just see it as stealing money now and have always preferred battlefield.
EA have made an awesome move to take Battlefield to WW1. The only other WW1 game I know of right now is Verdun, which helps. I also believe that the remake of COD 4 will flop. L0L
I've always been a COD fan through and through. I just like the flow and quicker playstyle better. I just hope they get back on the right track and make better streaks and maps. Either way, COD 4 should at least be a fresh breath of air
These games are two different experiences. Infinite warfare is going to be nice, competitive, and challenging respectfully. Battlefield bring a refreshing gamechanger with a past atmosphere. I love terrain damage that sells the game for me. I love Call of duty I can play that for hours with endless entertainment it comes down to choice when comparing these games and I choose both and will buy both.lol
Why is this a question lol
Obviously battlefield lol set in ww1 times like a real good game, cod for future is **** no one will get it, people only get it for cod 4 that's why no one liked aw either lol
Obviously battlefield lol set in ww1 times like a real good game, cod for future is **** no one will get it, people only get it for cod 4 that's why no one liked aw either lol